Legal Opinion

Petrovich v. Consolidated High School District 230

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 25, 1997No. 96 C 0782PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

COAR, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment on plaintiffs’, John and Margaret Petrovich’s, petition for attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 20 U.S.C. § 1415 of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion, defendant’s motion is granted and plaintiffs’ motion is denied.,'

Background

Plaintiffs John and Margaret Petrovich (“Petrovich”), on their own behalf and the behalf of their minor son, Anthony Petrovich, filed this action against Consolidated High…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Koswenda Ex Rel. Koswenda v. Flossmoor School District No. 161District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  2. John M. v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF CHICAGO, DIST. 299District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  3. KI Morgan Co., Inc. v. Chicago Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API