Legal Opinion

Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Animas Mosquito Control District

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 8, 1963No. 19812PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

We refer to the plaintiff in error as the telephone company and to the defendant in error as the district.

On September 28, 1960, the trial court entered an order creating the district pursuant to authority granted by C.R.S. ’53, 89-3 (1947 Act), which sanctions the organization of water districts, sewage disposal and sanitation districts, police protection districts, safety protec*75tion districts, and metropolitan districts, the latter designed to afford the benefits of two or more of the above mentioned purposes.

In 1959 the legislature amended the 1947 act by adding to the above mentioned…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Allen v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Huntington v. WorthenSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. City & County of Denver v. LynchSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
  4. New York Life Insurance v. HardisonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  5. City of Denver v. BachSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Bayside Timber Co. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  2. Kinterknecht v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  3. Desert Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp.Nevada Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Breternitz v. City of ArvadaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. Howell v. Woodlin School District R-104Supreme Court of Colorado · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API