Legal Opinion

Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 4, 1953No. Civ. 19349PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOTT (Robert H.), J. pro tem.

Three actions consolidated for trial were decided in favor of plaintiff and from that judgment defendants appeal.

Following the example of all counsel, we shall refer to the parties by their respective first names. Defendants Walter and Rose were husband and wife. They are parents of plaintiff Murray and of Fanchon.

There has been prolonged and bitter litigation among these parties (see Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum, 86 Cal.App.2d 750 [195 P.2d 492]; Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum, 96 Cal.App.2d 197 [214 P.2d 603]; Metzenbaum v. Metzenbaum, 115 Cal.App.2d 395 [252 P.2d 31,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Eastin v. Bank of StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Franzen v. ShenkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Murdock v. GerthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Babb v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Ramstead v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Scannell v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API