Dye v. CNX Gas Company, LLC
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Justice ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN.
Nella Kate Martin Dye filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the term "minerals" used in two severance deeds executed in 1886 and 1887 did not effect a conveyance of the natural gas and coal bed methane (collectively "gas") underlying her land. Relying upon Warren v. Clinchfield Coal Corp., 166 Va. 524 , 186 S.E. 20 (1936), the circuit court held that the term "minerals" included the gas as a matter of law and sustained demurrers to Dye's original and amended complaints. On appeal, Dye argues that the circuit court erred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
- Dunham & Shortt v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Murray v. AllredTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Langman v. ALUMNI ASS'N OF U. OF VA.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
- Langman v. Alumni Association of the UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- RECP IV WG Land Investors LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Hale v. Town of Warrenton (ORDER)Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
- Michael H. Drewry v. Board of Supervisors of Surry County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025