Legal Opinion

Dye v. CNX Gas Company, LLC

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 21, 2016No. Record 150282PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Justice ELIZABETH A. McCLANAHAN.

Nella Kate Martin Dye filed a declaratory judgment action seeking a determination that the term "minerals" used in two severance deeds executed in 1886 and 1887 did not effect a conveyance of the natural gas and coal bed methane (collectively "gas") underlying her land. Relying upon Warren v. Clinchfield Coal Corp., 166 Va. 524 , 186 S.E. 20 (1936), the circuit court held that the term "minerals" included the gas as a matter of law and sustained demurrers to Dye's original and amended complaints. On appeal, Dye argues that the circuit court erred…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Dunham & Shortt v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  3. Murray v. AllredTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Langman v. ALUMNI ASS'N OF U. OF VA.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1994
  5. Langman v. Alumni Association of the UniversitySupreme Court of Virginia · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. RECP IV WG Land Investors LLC v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  2. Hale v. Town of Warrenton (ORDER)Supreme Court of Virginia · 2017
  3. Michael H. Drewry v. Board of Supervisors of Surry County, VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API