Legal Opinion

Murray v. Allred

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1897PublishedCited by 50 opinions

FROM FENTRESS. Appeal from Chancery Court of Fentress County. T. J. Fisher, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

This cause was decided for defendant by the Chancellor, and his decree was reversed *101by the Court of Chancery Appeals, and the cause is now before us on appeal of defendant and assignment of errors.

The very interesting question is presented whether petipleum oil ' is a mineral or not. It arises upon the construction of a deed which conveyed certain lands, reserving to the grantor ‘ all mines, minerals, and metals in and under the land.” Subsequent conveyances -were made to third persons without reservation, and the present owners hold under a deed conveying in fee simple and making no…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Westmoreland N. Gas Co. v. DeWittSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. Lillibridge v. Lackawanna Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Funk v. HaldemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
  4. Henry v. LoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1880
  5. Stewart v. ChadwickSupreme Court of Iowa · 1859

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Texas Company v. W.H. DaughertyTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Sult v. A. Hochstetter Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gas Products Co. v. RankinMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Barker v. Campbell-Ratcliff Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Faith United Methodist Church & Cemetery of Terra Alta v. MorganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API