Legal Opinion

In re Viloxazine

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided July 6, 2026No. 2:25-cv-12183Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Civil Action No. 25-12183 (MEF) (MAH) IN RE VILOXAZINE OPINION The non-Zydus Defendants,1 through Defendants Zenara Pharma Private Limited and Biophore Pharma Inc., seek leave to amend their invalidity contentions and join the Zydus Defendants’ contentions for the method-of-treatment patents. June 10, 2026 Letter from Non- Zydus Defendants, D.E. 111. Plaintiff Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Supernus” or “Plaintiff”) opposes the request on two grounds: (1) the non-Zydus Defendants have not demonstrated good cause or adequate diligence; and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Computer Acceleration Corp. v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2007
  2. Sanofi-Aventis v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API