Legal Opinion
Computer Acceleration Corp. v. Microsoft Corp.
District Court, E.D. Texas
Decided August 24, 2007No. 1:06-cv-00140PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MICROSOFT’S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTION OF PLAINTIFF’S RULE 3-1 INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
CLARK, District Judge.
Defendant Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) seeks to strike Plaintiff Computer Acceleration Corporation’s (“CAC”) infringement contentions related to Microsoft’s Windows Vista (“Vista”) product, for being insufficiently detailed in violation of P.R. 3-1 (c) of the Rules of Practice for Patent Cases of the Eastern District of Texas. [Doc. #85] The infringement contentions were contained in a footnote, which indicated that Vista infringed in a manner similar to the Windows…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- S&w Enterprises, L.L.C., a Nevada Limited Liability Company v. Southtrust Bank of Alabama, Na, an Alabama Banking CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Albert Flaksa v. Little River Marine Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Betzel v. State Farm LloydsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
- Roberts v. Galen of Virginia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- TFH Publications, Inc. v. Doskocil Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2010
- Linex Technologies, Inc. v. Belkin International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- B-K Lighting, Inc. v. Vision3 LightingDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2013
- ROY-G-BIV Corp. v. ABB, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.