Legal Opinion
Sanofi-Aventis v. BARR LABORATORIES, INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 20, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1605 (WJM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MARK FALK, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court by way of Defendants’ request for leave to submit a reply expert report limited to the issue of secondary considerations of non-obviousness raised by Plaintiff in its rebuttal expert report on invalidity. The Court has considered the parties submissions on the matter, namely Defendants’ letter dated December 23, 2008 and Plaintiffs letter dated January 14, 2009. 1 No oral argument was heard. Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. For the reasons that follow, Defendants’ request is denied without prejudice.
BACKGROUND
A. The '531…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Pfizer, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mas-Hamilton Group v. Lagard, Inc., (Now Known as Masco Corporation) and Hi-Shear Technology CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Structural Rubber Products Company v. Park Rubber Company and International Metals and MacHines Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- ALLERGAN PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. PRINSTON PHARMACEUTICAL INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Blue Gentian, LLC v. Tristar Products, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- GESTURE TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. LG ELECTRONICS INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- In re ViloxazineDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- WAG ACQUISITION, L.L.C. v. DUODECAD IT SERVICES LUXEMBOURG S.a r.1.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020