Legal Opinion

National Carloading Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 8, 1940No. C. D. 364PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dallinger, Judge:

This is a suit against the United States, arising at the port of New York, brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on a particular importation described in the invoice as “ 1 MAAG Pitch Measuring Instrument, *34Type TME No. 1976.” Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as a manufacture of metal not specially provided for. It is claimed that said merchandise is properly dutiable at the rate of 27% per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of said act as a machine not…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James G. Wiley Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API