Legal Opinion

Collins v. Ames

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 18, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Black, J.

The only controverted point on this appeal is whether the agency involved is a question of law for the court to decide or one of fact to be determined by a .jury. The trial judge decided that Joseph Kaiglm was the agent and attorney for the defendant, Frank C. Ames, Jr., in the transaction. He directed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $4,600.36. This is the error complained of as the ground of appeal. The controversy grew out of the following undisputed facts: Collins, the plaintiff, bought from the defendant, ikmes, a farm…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Hinckley Fibre Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  2. Holzsager v. WarburtonDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1978
  3. MILLER EX REL. MILLER v. LindeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  4. State v. Joule Technical Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  5. Roberson v. BondurantNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API