Legal Opinion
United States v. Misael Hernandez-Hernandez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 27, 2004No. 02-30429PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Opinion, and the Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent, filed on June 30, 2004, have, been amended. With these amendments, Judges Gould and Tallman have voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Kleinfeld has voted to grant the petition for panel rehearing and to grant the petition for rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
*802The petition for panel rehearing and the petition for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Javier Rivera-Sanchez, A/K/A Jose SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Gilberto Pimentel-FloresCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Timothy Dean SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Hernandez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Isidro Moreno-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.