Legal Opinion

San Antonio & Aransas Pass Railway Co. v. Timon

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 16, 1907PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bee County. Tried below before Hon. James C. Wilson.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

sued appellant to recover damages to certain cattle alleged to have accrued by reason of the failure of appellant to furnish cars at Skidmore in which to transport the cattle to East St. Louis, Illinois, in compliance with an oral contract. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee in the sum of eight hundred dollars.

There can be no doubt that an agreement was made by the agent of appellant to furnish the cars. Russek, who contracted for the cars for appellee, stated he told the agent that appellee wanted ten or twelve cars, not less than ten, in which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hume Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Jackson & EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Easton v. DudleyTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  4. McCarty v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Newport News, Co. v. Mercer & WarfieldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Texarkana & Ft. S. Ry. Co. v. BrassTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  2. Chattanooga Southern Railroad v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  3. San Antonio & A. P. Ry. Co. v. BrachtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. W. C. Munn Co. v. WestfallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. LockhartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API