Legal Opinion

McCarty v. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890No. 3247PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Ellis. Tried below before Hon. Anson Raine.y.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

Appellants sue to recover for injury to cattle resulting from two causes, for both of which it is claimed appellee is liable.

1. It is claimed that appellee contracted to furnish cars and to receive appellants’ beeves on September 24, 1887, for transportation from Ballinger, Texas, to Chicago, Illinois, but that appellee failed to do this until four days afterwards, whereby they were damaged on account of deterioration of cattle while held at or near place of shipment, where the pasturage was not good; and further, that on account of this delay appellants were compelled…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Easton v. DudleyTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HarrimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Hume Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Jackson & EdwardsTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Beck v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Johnson Grain Co. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API