Legal Opinion

Smelser v. Pugh

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1902No. 4,073PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From Marion Superior Court; J. M. Leathers, Judge. Action by George M. Smelser against Edgar Pugb on a contract of settlement. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiley, C. J.

Appellant and appellee were partners engaged in selling groceries at retail. Prior to the commence^ ment of this action that partnership was dissolved by mutual consent, and the supposed terms of dissolution were reduced to writing, and are as follows: “Indianapolis, Ind., Sept 22, 1899. This is to certify that George Smelser and Edgar Pugh have to-day dissolved partnership, George Smelser having sold to Edgar Pugh his interest in stock of groceries, fixtures, horses, and wagons, etc., located at and known as 435 & 437 N. Roble street, Indianapolis, for the sum of $552.18, for value received,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Walden v. SkinnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Citizens' National Bank v. JudyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Keister v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Roszell v. RoszellIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Parchen v. ChessmanMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. Webb v. HammondIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  4. Bell Nat. Bank Pineville's Rec. v. EllisonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  5. Renihan v. PiowatyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API