Legal Opinion
Roszell v. Roszell
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1887No. 11,938PublishedCited by 11 opinions
From the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
The facts in this case are stated, and an important preliminary question decided, in Roszell v. Roszell, 105 Ind. 77. The case is now before us for decision upon its merits, the errors assigned being that the court below erred in overruling the appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, and in overruling his motion for a new trial.
In substance, the complaint discloses the following facts: In 1862 James M. Roszell enlisted in the army. Having received $175 bounty money, he purchased a lot of Smith Armstrong, which the latter owned by title bond only. Roszell paid the entire purchase-price to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Worley v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Hosford v. MerwinNew York Supreme Court · 1848
- Morrison v. CollierIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Welshbillig v. DienhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Murray v. SellsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keister v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Gray v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of HonorIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Connecticut Fire Ins. v. Oakley Improved Building & Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
- Gierhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp.-ConrailIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Earl v. VanNattaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.