Legal Opinion
Williams v. C. & W. C. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided July 5, 1922No. 10862PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Fraser.
The statement in the case reads:
“This action is brought to recover $25,000 damages on account of the alleged failure of defendant to provide proper and safe appliances at the water tank in Varnville, and in the alleged failure to keep same in a safe and suitable condition; it being alleged that plaintiff was a fireman for defendant on an interstate train when he undertook to take water at Varnville on March 15, 1920, in line with his duties ánd the rope which it was necessary for him to pull either broke or tore loose from its…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. TilghmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Bodie v. Charleston & Western Carolina Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tucker v. Holly Hill Lumber CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. StuartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- McAlister, Admx. v. Southern Rwy. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1924
- Morgan v. RoperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967