Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan Sisters
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Dissent
SHIRLEY S, ABRAHAMSON, J.
(dissenting). The record in this case is almost devoid of facts. Yet the majority fashions a new rule governing liability for necessaries. I dissent.
We know only that Mr. and Mrs. Stromsted were husband and wife; that they were living together at the time Mrs. Stromsted consented to and received medical services; that Mrs. Stromsted committed suicide; that the hospital filed a claim against her estate; that the estate refused to pay the claim asserting that the husband should be liable, not the estate. We do not know anything about the past dealings between husband,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jersey Shore Medical Center-Fitkin Hospital v. Estate of BaumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- Jewell v. SchmidtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Seitz v. SeitzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Seifert v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
- Fischer v. FischerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.