Legal Opinion
Property 10-F, Inc. v. Pack & Process, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1970No. 4977PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Chief Judge.
Appellee obtained judgment for damages for breach of contract. Appellant contends that the trial court, sitting without a jury, was in error in not sustaining its defense of the statute of limitations.
The trial court found that the breach occurred “at some time during the period from July 30, 1964 through October, 1965, and by a preponderance of the evidence it is found that the breach occurred on or before April 16, 1965”. The court further found that in a letter written May 14, 1965, appellant stated its position that the contract was still in existence as of that date,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fowler v. A & A Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1970
- Regus v. SchartkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Reat v. Illinois Central RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Lobrovich v. GeorgisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Howard University v. CassellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Florence Goldman v. August BequaiCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Interdonato v. InterdonatoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Spoljaric v. PanganIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Snow v. Capitol Terrace, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.