Gengarelly v. Glen Cove Urban Renewal Agency
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Plaintiffs commenced this action, inter alia, to declare that the urban renewal plan of the City of Glen Cove, insofar as it affects plaintiff Gengarelly’s premises and plaintiff Brigati’s business, constitutes a taking of property for which just compensation is required. Defendants Glen Cove Urban Renewal Agency and the City of Glen Cove appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, which, inter alia, denied their motion to dismiss the complaint. The order should be affirmed.
We agree with Special Term that the dismissal of plaintiffs’ earlier action was based…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Priestly v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
- Holmes v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Egerer v. New York Central & Hudson River R. R.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Holmes v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- La Briola v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by16 opinions
- Fay v. South Colonie Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- De Ronda v. Greater Amsterdam School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Cohen v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Fay v. South Colonie Central School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Baker v. Village of ElmsfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.