Legal Opinion

Utility Consumers' Action Network, Inc. v. AT&T Broadband of Southern Cal., Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 20, 2006No. B179348PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUBIN, J.

Plaintiff Utility Consumers’ Action Network, Inc. (UCAN), appeals from the summary judgment entered in favor of defendants— numerous AT&T and MediaOne cable Internet service providers—in an action to determine the legality of a late fee liquidated damages provision contained in defendants’ service contracts. Plaintiff also appeals from the concomitant order denying its motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth, post, the trial court’s summary judgment orders were correct, and we affirm the judgment that followed.

ISSUE PRESENTED

Businesses with half a million…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Perdue v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Garrett v. Coast & Southern Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Better Food Markets, Inc. v. American District Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Cooper v. Union BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cellphone Termination Fee CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. People v. SolorzanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Ticketmaster L.L.C. v. Prestige Entm't, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  4. Hendricks Property Management Corp. v. Birchwood Properties Ltd. PartnershipNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Gund v. Cnty. of Trinity, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API