Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Thornton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided June 13, 1955No. 35706PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
The evidence introduced on the trial of the case did not support the defendant’s plea of no consideration, and therefore, the trial court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold, 52 Ga. App. 304 (183 S. E. 104); Hall v. Beavers, 78 Ga. App. 722 (2) (51 S. E. 2d 879); Ray v. Marett, 84 Ga. App. 86 (65 S. E. 2d 646).
Judgment affirmed.
Felton, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hall v. BeaversCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
- Ray v. MarettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Dietz v. Bank of RinggoldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Standard Dry-Wall Co. v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1956