Legal Opinion
Dietz v. Bank of Ringgold
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 20, 1935No. 25253PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
Under the evidence, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant’s plea that the notes sued on were without consideration was not sustained by the evidence.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles, O. J., and MacIntyre, J., concur.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Barnes v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955