Legal Opinion

Hall v. Beavers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1949No. 32281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) Hall, the plaintiff in error, alleged that the note sued on was made by him to Beavers, the defendant in error, for the sole purpose of obtaining the cancellation of a security deed which the defendant in error was already under a duty to cancel and deliver to him, but refused to do so until the plaintiff in error executed the note in question for a pretended debt which he did not owe.

The evidence shows that Ha-11 had purchased a 50-acre tract of land, for which he agreed to pay $1500, that he paid $300 cash and gave three notes for $400 each, payable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Preston v. HamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  2. City Electric Railway Co. v. Floyd CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Folds v. FoldsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Prince Hall Masonic Building Ass'n v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
  5. Hall v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Collins v. Louisville & Wadley RailroadCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  2. Morgan's Inc. v. MonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  3. Dronzek v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Barnes v. ThorntonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1955
  5. Mansfield v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API