Legal Opinion

People v. Rankin

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 5, 1958No. Crim. 6101PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAshburn, J.

Appellants were convicted of 10 counts of violation of section 26104, subdivision (a), Corporations Code, through the sale of undivided interests and issuance of certificates of interest in a mining title and lease without first securing a permit from the Commissioner of Corporations. Each appeals from the judgment and an order denying his motion for new trial.

Appellants’ main argument is that there could be no violation of the statute because they merely induced the complaining witnesses to join with them in locating mining claims on public lands and collected $250 for each one-eighth…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. People v. AshleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Domestic & Foreign Petroleum Co. v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Austin v. Hallmark Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  5. People v. SidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. People v. RankinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Oil Lease Service, Inc. v. StephensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. Investco Mgmt. & Dev. LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. People v. CarusoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API