Legal Opinion
Nehemiah Corp. of America v. Jackson
District Court, E.D. California
Decided March 3, 2008No. CIV. S-07-2056 LKK/DADPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Nehemiah Corporation of America (“Nehemiah”) has brought this action against the Department of Housing and Urban Development and its Secretary Alphonso Jackson (collectively, “HUD”) pursuant to the Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 551. Nehemiah alleges that HUD violated the APA when it adopted a rule barring the use of seller-funded downpayment assistance for mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”), a component of HUD. In particular, Nehemiah claims that HUD failed to provide a reasoned analysis…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Home Box Office, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of America, Professional Baseball, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Portland Cement Association v. RuckelshausCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Edge Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Pfeifer v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- State v. Bureau of Land Mgmt.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Penobscot Indian Nation v. United States Department of Housing & Urban DevelopmentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Center for Biological Diversity v. GouldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.