Legal Opinion

State v. Brooks

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 14, 1975No. 47,759PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Owsley, J.:

Defendant, Joe Brooks, appeals from a conviction of the possession of heroin with intent to sell, and sale of same, in violation of K. S. A. 1974 Supp. 65-4127a. The issue on appeal concerns the admissibility of certain testimony by the state’s expert witness.

As part of its case-in-chief, the state called Ronald Jones, a forensic chemist for the Kansas Bureau of Investigation, who analyzed the drugs in question for the state. After testifying in detail as to his background and qualifications as a forensic chemist, Jones stated his opinion of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Casey v. Phillips Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Howard v. StoughtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  3. Ziegler v. CrofootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  4. State v. KearnsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  5. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. GarciaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. State v. StrauchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Curtis v. FredenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
  5. State v. ReedCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API