Legal Opinion
In Re 1985 Grand Jury Proceedings
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1986No. 85-5218PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.
Appellants, three paving and construction companies, seek review of a District Court 1 order which denied them access to certain records of the federal grand jury which is investigating them. The United States has moved to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, asserting that the order is neither a final judgment nor a collateral order within the doctrine of Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). We grant the motion to dismiss.
Appellants are subjects or targets of a grand-jury antitrust investigation in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re: Grand JuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 15, 1986. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and Nabisco Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated January 15, 1986. Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986