Legal Opinion
In re: Grand Jury
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 22, 2007No. 06-3078, 06-3095PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
This case raises a question that, surprisingly, has not yet been decided by this court: whether federal grand jury witnesses, after they have testified, are entitled to examine the transcripts of their own testimony. Applying Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e)(3)(E)(i), we hold that grand jury witnesses are entitled to review the transcripts of their own testimony in private at the U.S. Attorney’s Office or a place agreed to by the parties or designated by the district court.
I
During a criminal investigation of a company and its employees, the…
3Cases cited41 opinions
- Church of Scientology of California v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by18 opinions
- In Re GRAND JURYCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Doe v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- In re: App. Cmte. of the JudiciaryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2020
- In re National Security LetterDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2013
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.