State v. Hayward
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C.J.
Defendants were indicted and convicted of possession of cocaine, amphetamines, methamphetamines, marihuana and lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) contrary to ORS 167.207. The- sole issue in this appeal concerns the denial of the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence obtained during a search of their residence. Defendants’ only contention is that the reliability of an unnamed informant was not established by the affidavit supporting the search warrant. As did the trial judge, we hold to the contrary.
In its pertinent portions, the affidavit in support of the request for a search warrant states:
“…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
- State v. MetlerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- State v. ThackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. BroderickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
3Cited by12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BenlienMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- Merrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Blue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Levett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991
- State v. MatsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.