Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Benlien

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 18, 1989No. 88-P-1003PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKaplan, J.

A “no knock” search warrant permitted a search for any controlled substances and related materials in premises at 59 Weller Avenue, Pittsfield, occupied by James Benlien. Search pursuant to the warrant uncovered quantities of cocaine and marihuana and characteristic paraphernalia, and, upon trial, jury-waived, of the ensuing indictments, Benlien was found guilty of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute and possession of marihuana. The judgments of conviction are attacked on this appeal for claimed errors in the denial of a pretrial motion to suppress the evidence mentioned.

1. The…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Commonwealth v. UptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JimenezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. DesperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  4. Commonwealth v. MelendezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  5. Commonwealth v. FernandesMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API