Legal Opinion
Heine v. Newman Tannenbaum
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 27, 1994No. 91 Civ. 2904 (PKL)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action for legal malpractice, with jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. This case was originally filed on April 29, 1991, by plaintiffs, Chrisal Investments Ltd. and Georg H.G. Heine (collectively “Heine”), against defendants: Alvin Ashley (“Ashley”); Colton, Hartnick, Yamin & Sheresky (“Col-ton Hartnick”); and Newman, Tannenbaum, Helpern, Syracuse & Hirschtritt (“Newman Tannenbaum”). On September 24, 1991, defendant Ashley pleaded guilty to five counts of grand larceny in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Allen v. Westpoint-Pepperell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Brass v. American Film Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- O'BRIEN v. National Property Analysts PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
- Villanueva v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Caldwell v. Hanes (In Re Hanes)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
- Hatfield v. HerzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Tush v. PharrAlaska Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.