Legal Opinion
Brooks v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 26, 1925No. 4571PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
The information in this case is a complex mass, slovenly thrown together. It contains the three counts commonly found in informations filed under the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. .‘Inn. Supp. 1923, § 10138% et seq.); the first count charging the maintenance of a common nuisance at a stated time and place, the second count charging the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor at the same time and place, and the third count charging the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor at or about the same time and place. Immediately following the third count of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Remus v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
- Simpson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
- People v. FritzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Roman v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- Langford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- State v. GoodyearArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Weinbaum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Bilodeau v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
- United States v. One Buick AutomobileDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.