Legal Opinion

Dougherty, J. v. Pepper Hamilton

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 2016No. 2455 EDA 2014PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

SHOGAN, J.:

Appellant, John J. Dougherty, appeals from the order granting summary judgment in favor of Pepper Hamilton LLP (“Pepper Hamilton”), ■ and its attorneys Amy B. Ginensky, Michael E. Baughman, Peter M. Smith, and Raphael Cunniff (collectively “Appellees”), in this civil action alleging breach, of fiduciary duty and breach of contract. For the reasons ¡that follow, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

We summarize the protracted history of this case as follows. On October 30, 2003, Appellant retained Pepper Hamilton to represent him in relation to a federal matter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. McGrawWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Chenot v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Pro MacHineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. Fiorentino v. RapoportSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Del Pielago, A. v. Orwig, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  2. AVCO CORPORATION v. TURNERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2022
  3. AVCO CORPORATION v. TURNERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
  4. KARDOSH v. MCCALLINDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. Morrison, G. v. Rhoads & Sinon LLPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API