Legal Opinion
KARDOSH v. MCCALLIN
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 5, 2025No. 2:25-cv-01946Unknown
1Opinion
FORI NT HTEH EE AUSNTIETREND DSTISATTREISC DT IOSTFR PIECNTN CSOYULVRAT NIA JULIA KARDOSH, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-CV-1946 : CHERYL MCCALLIN, : Defendant. : MEMORANDUM SÁNCHEZ, J. MAY 5, 2025 Plaintiff Julia Kardosh initiated this pro se civil action against Cheryl McCallin, Esquire, based on McCallin’s representation of Kardosh in a Pennsylvania state court child dependency matter. Kardosh seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Kardosh leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss her Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Sandra Connelly v. Lane Construction CorpCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Mark D. Tourscher v. Martin Horn, Secretary of the Pa. Dept. Of Corrections John McCullough Superintendent ,(d.c. Civil No. 98-Cv-00176j)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.