Legal Opinion
Hale-Rice v. Maine State Retirement System
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided April 4, 1997PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Plaintiff, Susan Hale-Rice, appeals from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Fritzsche, J.) affirming the decision of the Board of Trustees (Board) of the Maine State .Retirement System (MSRS) denying her application for disability retirement benefits. She argues on appeal that the Board’s decision reveals constitutional errors and other errors of law, is not supported by substantial evidence on the record, and is arbitrary and capricious. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment.
[¶2] The facts presented to the hearing officer may be summarized…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- New England Whitewater Center, Inc. v. Department of Inland Fisheries & WildlifeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Forester v. City of WestbrookSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- Douglas v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Maine Bankers Ass'n v. Bureau of BankingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- AFSCME Council 93 v. Maine Labor Relations BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Forest Ecology Network v. Land Use Regulation CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
- Kelley v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- Downeast Energy Corp. v. Fund Insurance Review BoardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- York Insurance of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Munjoy Sporting & Athletic Club v. DowSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.