Legal Opinion
Elster v. Friedman
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 5, 1989No. B026037PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Phillip C. Friedman and Charlene Kahle appeal from the award of costs and attorney fees in favor of Sandy Elster and Ernestine Elster in the Elsters’ action for an injunction prohibiting harassment. The question on appeal is whether respondents are the “prevailing parties” within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 527.6, subdivision (h). We affirm.
The following allegations are taken from respondents’ application for a temporary restraining order. In 1973 respondents bought a duplex comprising an upper unit and a lower unit. In December 1974 they conveyed a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- California Common Cause v. DuffyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
3Cited by15 opinions
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Maryland Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Heather Farms Homeowners Assn. v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Reveles v. Toyota by the BayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Kenne v. StennisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Gulf Ins. Co. v. TIG Ins. Co.California Court of Appeal · 2001
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.