Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Roman v. Department of Corrections

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Senior Judge FLAHERTY.

Sandra L. Roman (Claimant) petitions for review of a determination of the De partment of Corrections (DOC) denying her request for a hearing regarding her entitlement to Act 632 benefits. 1 We affirm.

While Claimant was working for DOC in 1989, she sustained a back injury during an altercation with an inmate. Claimant had spinal fusion surgery performed to treat this injury and returned to work. Thereafter, in 1995, Claimant slipped and fell while at work and began receiving benefits under either Act 632 or the Heart and Lung Act. 2 DOC contends that Claimant…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Callahan v. Pennsylvania State PoliceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Cunningham v. COM., PENN. ST. POLICESupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Camaione v. Borough of LatrobeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Hardiman v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Sidlow v. Township of Nether ProvidenceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Virginia Imports, Ltd. v. Kirin Brewery of America, LLC and Virgina Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2007
  2. Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. McWreath v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Celi v. Department of Public WelfareCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Cantarella v. Department of CorrectionsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API