Cloud v. Dean
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit was on the common counts against the Republic Creosoting Company, and defendants Dean were brought in by way of the statute providing for intervention or claim. Code 1907, § 6050.
The court made an order that the Deans, as individuals or as composing the firm of Dean Bros., were made defendants, hut did not formally declare, in the language of the statute, that said substituted defendants should stand in the place of the original defendant; nor did that order formally discharge the original defendant from liability to plaintiff, as provided in the statute. The record recites that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Ward v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
- Webb v. MullinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
- Stewart v. SampleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Sanford v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Morris v. WaldropSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
- First Nat. Bank of Mobile v. BurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Scott v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.