Legal Opinion

Provenzano v. Integrated Genetics

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided October 13, 1998No. Civ.A. 97-1460(MLC)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HUGHES, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on motion of Defendants, Integrated Genetics, Genzyme Genetics, Genzyme Corporation, and Sterling Puck, M.D., for summary judgment. Also pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ motion for leave of Court to amend the Complaint by joining Dr. Charles H. Hux and Shore Perinatal Associates as defendants. Both motions are opposed. The Court reviewed the parties’ written submissions and conducted oral argument on September 8, 1998 and October 5, 1998. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bailey v. KhourySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Canesi Ex Rel. Canesi v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
  3. Benczkowski v. Bohlin Cywinski JacksonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  4. Bivona v. Borough of GirardvilleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Canesi Ex Rel. Canesi v. WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API