People v. Herron
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
A jury convicted defendant, a prison inmate, of unauthorized possession of an implement by a convict which may be used to injure another. MCLA 800.283; MSA 28.1623. He appeals raising three assignments of error, one of which merits discussion.
Defendant asserts he was convicted under an unconstitutionally vague law. The people unsurprisingly maintain a contrary view. That part of the statute under attack reads:
"A convict without authorization, shall not have on his person or under his control or in his possession any weapon or other implement which may be used to injure any convict or other…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. RainesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kalita v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. StantonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. CavaianiMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. GratschMichigan Court of Appeals · 2013
- People v. GilliamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. IgazMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.