Legal Opinion

Rutter v. Rutter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 7, 2013No. S12G1915PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, Chief Justice.

We granted a writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Rutter v. Rutter, 316 Ga. App. 894 (730 SE2d 626) (2012), to determine which of two pieces of legislation, House Bill 1576 (Ga. L. 2000, p. 491, § 1) or Senate Bill 316 (Ga. L. 2000, p. 875, § 2), each constituting an alternative version of OCGA § 16-11-62 (2), survived to become law. To begin our task, we must examine when the acts were approved and when they became effective. To complete our task, we must decide whether the two acts can be reconciled and harmonized or whether they are repugnant to one another.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Inter-City Coach Lines Inc. v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  2. Ransom v. RansomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  3. Gunn v. BalkcomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Keener v. MacDougallSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  5. Rutter v. RutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jayko v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  2. GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Code Revision CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
  3. Rutter v. RutterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  4. State v. WilkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API