Legal Opinion

Kapischke v. County of Walworth

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 7, 1999No. 98-0796PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

Louis and Susan Kapischke appeal from a circuit court judgment affirming the Walworth County Park and Planning Commission's denial of their request for a conditional use permit. The Kapischkes sought to build a 350-foot multiple use communication tower on property that was zoned for agricultural use. On appeal, they argue that the Commission's denial: (1) violates the mandate of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.A. § 332 (West 1991 & Supp. 1999); (2) is inconsistent with the Walworth County zoning ordinance standards; (3) is contrary to law; and (4) is not supported by substantial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Westel-Milwaukee Co. v. Walworth CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Thorp v. Town of LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ottman v. Town of PrimroseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sills v. Walworth County Land Management CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Village of Hobart v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API