Kapischke v. County of Walworth
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
Louis and Susan Kapischke appeal from a circuit court judgment affirming the Walworth County Park and Planning Commission's denial of their request for a conditional use permit. The Kapischkes sought to build a 350-foot multiple use communication tower on property that was zoned for agricultural use. On appeal, they argue that the Commission's denial: (1) violates the mandate of the Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C.A. § 332 (West 1991 & Supp. 1999); (2) is inconsistent with the Walworth County zoning ordinance standards; (3) is contrary to law; and (4) is not supported by substantial…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Snyder v. Waukesha County Zoning Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- State Department of Natural Resources v. City of WaukeshaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Westel-Milwaukee Co. v. Walworth CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Thorp v. Town of LebanonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- Ottman v. Town of PrimroseWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- Sills v. Walworth County Land Management CommitteeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- AllEnergy Corporation v. Trempealeau County Environment & Land Use CommitteeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Village of Hobart v. Brown CountyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.