Legal Opinion

Hinkins Steamship Agency v. Freighters, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided November 30, 1972No. C-71 2405 ACWPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

WOLLENBERG, District Judge.

Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss alleging that the contract sued upon is not within the admiralty and maritime jurisdiction of the federal courts. (28 U.S.C. § 1333) The basis for this interpretation of the contract is that plaintiff, by the language of the complaint, describes itself as an agent for the performance of maritime services rather than a performer of such services itself. Defendant relies on Cory Brothers & Co. v. United States, 51 F.2d…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Archawski v. HaniotiSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Minturn v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. Cory Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  5. The ThamesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bergen Shipping Co., Ltd. v. Japan Marine Serv., Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  2. Peralta Shipping Corporation v. Smith & Johnson (Shipping) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. E.S. Binnings, Inc. v. M/V Saudi RiyadhCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Mortensen & Lange v. San Juan Mercantile Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
  5. Planned Premium Services of Louisiana, Inc. v. International Insurance Agents, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API