Planned Premium Services of Louisiana, Inc. v. International Insurance Agents, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
POLITZ, Circuit Judge:
This appeal requires that we decide whether an agreement to finance maritime insurance gives rise to admiralty jurisdic*165tion, 28 U.S.C. § 1333. Concluding that it does not, we affirm the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Background
International Insurance Agents, Inc. (“International”), a maritime insurance broker representing vessel owners, secured maritime insurance for Wiltz LeBlanc & Sons Boat Rentals, Inc. (“Wiltz”), Bowers Industries, Inc. (“Bowers”), and Maintenance Associates, Inc. (“Maintenance”). International arranged financing…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kossick v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Foremost Insurance v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- North Pacific Steamship Co. v. Hall Bros. Marine Railway & Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Ingersoll Milling Machine Co. v. M/V BodenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Theriot v. Bay Drilling Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Planned Premium Services Of Louisiana, Inc. v. International Insurance Agents, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991