Legal Opinion

Ochs v. PacifiCare of California

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 9, 2004No. B160624PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COFFEE, J.—

Health and Safety Code section 1371.4 1 generally requires health care service plans to pay for emergency medical care rendered to their enrollees, regardless of whether the provider rendering the services has contracted with the plan. Subdivision (e) of that section provides, “A health care service plan may delegate the responsibilities enumerated in this section to the plan’s contracting medical providers.” Here we conclude that a health care service plan is not statutorily obligated to pay for emergency services when it has delegated its payment responsibilities to a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1998
  5. J'Aire Corp. v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Centinela Freeman Emergency Medical Associates v. Health Net of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Yau v. Santa Margarita FordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Bell v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Prospect Medical Group, Inc. v. Northridge Emergency Medical GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
  5. ZEMBSCH v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API