Legal Opinion
Mencher v. Chesley
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 6, 1948PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
Plaintiff moves herein to strike out paragraphs 3 to 25 of the answer designated as a complete defense, paragraph 26 designated as a partial defense, paragraphs 27 to 66 designated as a second partial defense in justification, and paragraphs 67 to 70 designated as a partial defense, upon the ground that the same are insufficient in law.
Prior to August 22, 1944, plaintiff was regional information executive of the Office of Price Administration in charge of the information division of the regional office having jurisdiction of the States of New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Maryland, Delaware…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mencher v. ChesleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Ashcroft v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Briarcliff Lodge Hotel, Inc. v. Citizen-Sentinel Publishers, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Hoeppner v. Dunkirk Printing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Foley v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Quentin Reynolds v. Westbrook Pegler, the Hearst Corporation and Hearst Consolidated Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Foretich v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Schulman v. Anderson Russell Kill & Olick, P. C.New York Supreme Court · 1982
- Foretich v. Capital Cities/Abc, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
- Farrar v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.