Legal Opinion

Bland v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1990No. 90-35PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Raymond Franklin Bland appeals his convictions of possession with intent to deliver cocaine, possession of methamphetamine, and possession of marijuana.

We affirm.

Appellant raises the following issues:

1. Whether or not an Affidavit in support of a search and seizure warrant must set forth the complete description of the premises to be searched?

2. Whether or not the Court erred in allowing the Defendant’s statements into evidence?

3. Whether or not the Court erred in allowing inadmissible hearsay testimony?

4. Whether or not the Court erred in not declaring a mistrial for…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ostrowski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Dodge v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Roose v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mayer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. Dixon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Hall v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Farbotnik v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Hunter v. ReeceWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API