Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Denson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 2, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 20, 2005, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruling that claimant voluntarily left her employment as a customer service representative without good cause. The record establishes that claimant did not return to work following her disability and maternity leave because she could not find childcare for her children.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of VitaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. In re the Claim of WilderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of CottoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. In re the Claim of CottoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Matter of Bury (Consumer Reports Inc.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
  4. Matter of Kupiec (Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API