Legal Opinion

McGrady v. Munsey Trust Co.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 12, 1943No. 38PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment for possession of real estate rendered in favor of the landlord.

The sole error claimed is the trial court’s denial of a motion to dismiss the complaint. The ground of the motion was that the summons issued was void because the name

of the assistant clerk of court was placed on the summons by means of a rubber stamp. Appellant’s contention is based on Title 11, Section 711 of the District of Columbia Code (1940 Ed.), which provides: “In all suits in said court process shall be signed by the said clerk or assistant clerk in the name of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Estate of KnoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1890
  2. Ligare v. California Southern RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Sharman v. HuotMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Lewis v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  5. Cummings v. LandesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. HansonUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Packard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. State v. WattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  5. Sociedad de Gananciales Constituida por Rivera Flecha v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API