Legal Opinion

Gay v. Pope & Talbot, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1944PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

Plaintiff sues this defendant under the Federal Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (also popularly known as the Jones Act; TJ. S. Code, tit. 46, § 688,entitled: Recovery for injury to or death of seaman) to recover damages for injuries sustained by reason of defendant’s alleged negligence while in its employ upon a vessel claimed by plaintiff to be owned, operated and maintained by defendant. It moves to dismiss the complaint pursuant to subdivision 2 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice upon the ground that this court has not jurisdiction of the subject matter. This claim is based upon Public…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Housing Administration, Region No. 4 v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Reconstruction Finance Corporation v. JG Menihan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Brady v. Roosevelt Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Warren v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Blake v. North Shore Multiple Listing Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hust v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Young v. EngelsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API